Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 03:54

Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why does everyone hate Ed Sheeran so much?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Intercontinental title match is no longer happening at Night of Champions - Cageside Seats
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What is the best way to get started using AI to make my own apps?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
5 Things to Know Before the Stock Market Opens - Yahoo Finance
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
How can the K-pop fandom have such a toxic mentality?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Chesterfield man reverses diabetes after losing seven stone - BBC
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.